Post by account_disabled on Dec 27, 2023 21:22:40 GMT -6
Aalienability since these goods are and remain in the civil circuit as provided by art. para. of the Civil Code which completes the provisions of art. . of the Civil Code. Under these conditions it must be noted that art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions ended its effects by repeal with the entry into force of the Civil Code regarding the transfer into public ownership of the administrativeterritorial units of the lands covered by the norm of the special law. As for the provision in art. para. from.
Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions Country Email List by which it is prohibited to change the legal regime of the lands provided for in paragraph from the public property of the respective administrativeterritorial units in their private property it is found that it no longer has an object as a result of the repeal within the mentioned limits of art. para. . namely the transfer of land into the public ownership of the administrativeterritorial unit. For this reason it must be noted that together with para. the provision of art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions is contrary to art. . in conjunction with art. para. of the.
Civil Code and as a result was repealed by the entry into force of art. . of the Civil Code. This finding is not contradicted by the fact that art. para. of the Civil Code provides that private property assets are and remain in the civil circuit unless the law provides otherwise. The exception allowed by the mentioned norm takes into account possible contrary legal provisions regarding private property goods not public property goods as in the case of art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions.
Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions Country Email List by which it is prohibited to change the legal regime of the lands provided for in paragraph from the public property of the respective administrativeterritorial units in their private property it is found that it no longer has an object as a result of the repeal within the mentioned limits of art. para. . namely the transfer of land into the public ownership of the administrativeterritorial unit. For this reason it must be noted that together with para. the provision of art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions is contrary to art. . in conjunction with art. para. of the.
Civil Code and as a result was repealed by the entry into force of art. . of the Civil Code. This finding is not contradicted by the fact that art. para. of the Civil Code provides that private property assets are and remain in the civil circuit unless the law provides otherwise. The exception allowed by the mentioned norm takes into account possible contrary legal provisions regarding private property goods not public property goods as in the case of art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions.